Imagine spending years believing your case is behind you, only to be sent back to prison decades later. This is the harsh reality some elderly individuals face when their long-pending criminal appeals are suddenly dismissed. The Supreme Court of India has now urged High Courts to strike a balance when prioritizing criminal appeals, especially for those who have been out on bail for many years.

The Supreme Court Concern Over Delayed Appeals

The Supreme Court highlighted that while High Courts generally focus on cases where the accused remains in prison, cases where the accused is on bail should not be neglected. If an appeal is dismissed after decades, and the accused—who may now be old and frail—are sent back to prison, it could lead to unnecessary hardship. This is especially concerning in cases involving life sentences, where the accused may have already spent significant time outside prison while awaiting the final verdict.

The Supreme Court made these observations while hearing a case from Madhya Pradesh, involving a crime that took place in 1989. The High Court had modified the conviction under Section 302 of the IPC to the second part of Section 304 and sentenced the accused to the time already served. The reason? The accused were now in their seventies and eighties, making imprisonment after so many years seem harsh and impractical.

A Need for a Balanced Approach in Criminal Appeals

The Supreme Court pointed out the massive backlog of criminal appeals in Indian High Courts. Appeals involving convicted individuals in prison are naturally prioritized, while those on bail often get delayed for years. However, this practice creates a serious issue if an appeal is heard after a decade or more and gets dismissed, the question arises: should an elderly individual, who has lived in society for so long, suddenly be sent back to prison? To address this concern, the Court emphasized that certain cases especially those where the accused are on bail and are old should also be prioritized. Justice should be swift and fair, ensuring that no one is subjected to undue suffering because of judicial delays.

Justice Should Not Be Delayed for the Elderly

Legal battles can be exhausting, but when they drag on for decades, they take a toll not just on the accused but also on their families. The Supreme Court’s remarks highlight an urgent need for High Courts to reassess their approach to handling criminal appeals. A fair balance must be maintained, ensuring that the elderly and those who have spent years on bail are not unfairly punished due to long judicial processes.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are advised to consult legal professionals for specific legal concerns.

Also Read:

Supreme Court Slams Overpriced Lawyers: Justice Must Be Accessible to All

What is Tort Law: Legal Concepts and Practical Examples 

Comprehensive Law of Torts Notes: Key Principles and Case Studies