Hello Friends In today’s rapidly digitalizing world, Artificial Intelligence (AI) has made its place in every field. The judiciary is also not untouched by this. Supreme Court Justice B.R. Gavai recently expressed deep concern on this issue. He warned that excessive use of AI, especially in legal research, can be risky as many times AI-based platforms such as ChatGPT can generate incorrect case references and false legal facts.
Increasing of Artificial Intelligence in the judiciary
AI is being used in many ways in the judiciary. AI-based tools are helping in listing and arranging cases in courts for hearing. This is making it possible to dispose of cases faster and also reducing the workload of judges. AI-based scheduling systems have been implemented in many countries, which intelligently allocate cases in view of the workload of judges. This is making the judicial process more effective and organized.
Artificial Intelligence in legal research boon or curse?
However, amid the growing use of Artificial Intelligence AI, Justice Gavai termed its over-reliance in legal research as dangerous. He said that AI-based platforms can sometimes refer to cases that do not actually exist. In such cases, lawyers and researchers may face professional embarrassment, and it can also affect the judicial process. He also said that Artificial Intelligence AI can process huge amounts of legal data quickly and present information in a concise manner, but it cannot check the veracity of facts like humans. This is why sometimes AI-generated information can prove to be misleading or completely wrong, leading to unnecessary complications in the judicial system.
Is AI capable of taking judicial decisions?
Nowadays the possibilities of using Artificial Intelligence AI to take judicial decisions in future are also being discussed. Some experts believe that AI can predict the possible decisions of the court based on past decisions, but Justice Gavai raised serious questions on this. He said that justice does not only follow the rules of law, but ethics, sensitivity and human values also play an important role in it. Machines neither have emotions, nor can they understand social and moral complexities. The process of justice is not limited to facts and arguments, but it also requires empathy, fairness and a deep understanding of the circumstances.
Artificial Intelligence in Judiciary
Justice Gavai emphasized that Artificial Intelligence AI should be used only to improve the judicial process and make it more effective, and should not be seen as an alternative to judges. Technology can only be an aid tool, but the power to take the final decision should remain with humans. Artificial Intelligence can bring a revolutionary change in the judiciary, but it should be used judiciously and cautiously. It can certainly help in case management, research and speeding up the process, but its indiscriminate use can also lead to mistakes. Therefore, Artificial Intelligence should be viewed only as a supporting tool in the process of legal research and judicial decision-making, and not as the sole solution.
Disclaimer: This article is written for informational purposes only. Please consult a qualified legal expert or lawyer before taking a final decision in legal matters.
Also Read:
Supreme Court Slams Overpriced Lawyers: Justice Must Be Accessible to All
