In a development that has caught the attention of many, the Kerala High Court has sought a response from K V Thomas, the state’s special representative in Delhi, regarding an alleged misuse of public funds. The case centres around the use of Rs 30 lakh from the Members of Parliament Local Area Development Scheme (MPLADS) for the construction of a pond at the Azhakiyakavu Bhagavathy Temple in Palluruthy. A petition filed by Babu Suresh, a resident, claims that these funds were misused for temple-related works, which is strictly prohibited under MPLADS guidelines.
Case Behind the Misuse of MPLADS Funds
Suresh, who lives near the temple, has been vocal about his concerns for years. He has repeatedly raised questions about the improper use of taxpayer money for a religious project. According to his petition, in 2015, a proposal was put forward to construct a pond at the temple site using MPLADS funds. However, the administrative sanction for the project was granted based on incorrect survey details, including a survey number that did not correspond to the location of any pond.
Allegations and Investigations Into the Misuse of Funds
As if this wasn’t enough to raise alarm bells, the petition further claims that information obtained through the Right to Information (RTI) Act shows that no work was undertaken under the Wetland Scheme, which was supposed to fund the pond’s construction. It’s almost as if the paperwork didn’t match the reality of what was happening on the ground. Worse still, a plaque at the site falsely states that the work was completed using MPLADS funds, along with an additional contribution from the Kochi Corporation. The actual renovations were allegedly funded by devotees’ contributions, not the government scheme. What followed next was a series of complaints to the relevant authorities, including the Central Vigilance Commission, which forwarded the matter to the Vigilance & Anti-Corruption Bureau. Investigations conducted by several agencies, including the CBI, discovered prima facie irregularities in the use of MPLADS funds. Despite these findings, the state government has not taken any concrete steps to address the issue or recover the misused funds.
The Legal and Ethical Implications of Using Public Funds
The crux of Suresh’s plea lies in the fundamental principle that public funds cannot be used for works within places of worship or on land owned by religious organizations. This is a crucial point in his argument, as the guidelines for the MPLADS scheme prohibit such use of taxpayer money. The petition demands that the misused funds be recovered, as the release of Rs 30 lakh for the renovation of the temple pond is considered an illegal expenditure. This case has raised many questions about accountability and transparency in the use of public money. Suresh’s plea calls for justice, urging the authorities to take swift action against those responsible for the misuse of funds. It also serves as a reminder of the importance of ensuring that taxpayer money is used for the public good and not diverted for purposes that contravene established guidelines. The Kerala High Court has admitted the petition and issued a notice to K V Thomas, seeking his response by June 9, 2025.
What Will Be the Outcome?
As the case progresses, people are hoping for clarity and swift action from the government. The outcome of this case will likely set a precedent for how public funds are handled in the future, ensuring that they serve the public interest rather than being misappropriated for personal or religious purposes.
Disclaimer: This article is based on reports from public news sources. The views and opinions expressed are those of the petitioner and may not represent the final legal verdict or outcome.
Also Read:
Evolution and Scope of Administrative Law
Supreme Court Slams Overpriced Lawyers: Justice Must Be Accessible to All
