Imagine a world where young minds are free from the addictive grip of social media, where childhood is not dominated by screens but by real-life experiences. In a time when digital platforms are becoming an inseparable part of our lives, the concern about their impact on children is growing stronger. Recently, a plea was filed in the Supreme Court of India seeking a ban on social media use for children below 13 years, citing serious mental, emotional, and psychological risks. However, the court refused to intervene, stating that it is a matter of policy and should be decided by Parliament.

A Legal Battle for Young Minds

The petition, filed by the Zep Foundation, highlighted the alarming rise in mental health issues among children due to unrestricted access to social media. It pointed out that excessive screen time is leading to problems like depression, anxiety, social isolation, and even self-harm among minors. The petitioners urged the court to mandate strict age verification methods, such as biometric authentication, to prevent children from accessing social media platforms without proper parental oversight.

However, the Supreme Court made it clear that such regulations fall under the jurisdiction of the government and lawmakers. The bench, led by Justices B R Gavai and Augustine George Masih, granted the petitioners the liberty to present their case before the concerned authorities but declined to take direct action. The court stated, “It is a policy matter. You ask Parliament to enact the law.”

The Growing Concern Over Social Media’s Impact

India is home to over 462 million active social media users, and a significant portion of them are minors. With mobile connectivity reaching 78% of the population, children are spending hours every day scrolling through social media feeds, watching videos, and engaging with digital content. Studies have shown that this unregulated exposure is contributing to an unprecedented mental health crisis. Reports indicate that in Maharashtra alone, 17% of children aged 9-17 spend more than six hours daily on social media or gaming platforms. This excessive usage is not just a lifestyle choice—it is a growing public health emergency. The petitioners argued that the government must take immediate action by enforcing strict parental controls, implementing algorithmic safeguards against addictive content, and launching a nationwide digital literacy campaign.

Can Stricter Regulations Save the Future?

One of the key demands in the plea was the introduction of mandatory parental controls for children between 13 and 18 years old. The petition also called for real-time monitoring tools, stricter content restrictions, and heavy penalties for social media platforms failing to comply with child protection regulations. The concern is not just about parental supervision; it is about putting in place a system that actively protects young minds from digital harm. The argument is simple: if age restrictions exist for driving, alcohol, and even watching certain movies, why shouldn’t they apply to social media platforms that can deeply affect children’s psychological well-being?

What’s Next?

Now that the Supreme Court has refused to intervene, the responsibility lies with the policymakers. Will the government take the necessary steps to regulate children’s access to social media? Or will young users continue to be exposed to the risks of addiction, cyberbullying, and mental health struggles without any safeguards?

Parents, educators, and child rights activists will have to push for stronger laws and better digital awareness programs. The battle is far from over, and the future of millions of children in India depends on how soon authorities recognize the urgency of this issue.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. The views expressed are based on publicly available information and research on the topic. Readers are encouraged to stay informed and take necessary precautions regarding children’s digital safety.

Also Read:

Supreme Court Slams Overpriced Lawyers: Justice Must Be Accessible to All

Understanding the Law of Torts Bare Act: A Complete Guide

Evolution and Scope of Administrative Law