It’s heartbreaking to see that even in today’s world, where we talk about progress, equality, and women’s rights, some age-old mindsets still linger in our society. A recent judgment by the Delhi High Court brought this issue to light in a deeply emotional and powerful way by drawing a parallel with the ancient tale of Draupadi from the Mahabharata.

The Adultery Case That Reopened a Bigger Debate

The case before the Delhi High Court dated back to 2010, when a man accused his wife of having an extramarital affair. According to him, her call logs showed frequent late-night conversations with another man, and he later found out that the two had stayed overnight at a hotel in Lucknow. Feeling betrayed, he sent a legal notice to his wife and filed a criminal complaint under Section 497 of the Indian Penal Code, which at the time criminalised adultery, but only against the man in the relationship.

The Delhi High Court: Powerful Reference to the Mahabharata

When the case reached the Delhi High Court, Justice Neena Bansal Krishna delivered a strong and moving message. Referring to the Mahabharata, she spoke about how Draupadi, one of the most powerful yet victimised characters in Indian epics, was gambled away by her husband Yudhishthir while her other four husbands stayed silent. That episode was not just a tragic story but a timeless lesson about the cost of treating women as property.

The Joseph Shine Judgment Changed Everything

In 2018, the Supreme Court struck down Section 497 in the historic Joseph Shine v. Union of India case. It ruled that the law was unconstitutional because it treated women unequally, denied them agency, and was based on archaic views of marriage. The Delhi High Court made it clear that this verdict would apply retrospectively, even to cases like the one from 2010.

The Delhi High Court also observed that merely staying overnight in a hotel room is not proof of sexual intercourse and cannot justify a criminal trial under a law that no longer exists. Without clear evidence, the case against the accused man had no grounds. The Court therefore quashed the proceedings and discharged him.

A Wake-Up Call for Society

This case goes beyond a legal battle; it is a mirror held up to our society. Justice Krishna’s words remind us that despite laws evolving, mindsets often don’t. It’s time we stopped treating women as objects or property. It’s time we listened to their voices, respected their choices, and treated them as equal individuals, not extensions of someone else’s identity.

Disclaimer: This article is written for informational and awareness purposes only. It is based on publicly available court records and news reports. The content does not intend to influence any legal proceeding or disrespect any individual, religion, or community.

Also Read:

Supreme Court Slams Overpriced Lawyers: Justice Must Be Accessible to All

Delayed But Not Denied: Supreme Court Revives Claims Under Limitation Law

Understanding the Law of Torts Bare Act: A Complete Guide